
By Argon Law Special Counsel Rachel Martin
Australia’s privacy landscape shifted dramatically in 2025, with the Privacy Act 1988 amendments introducing steeper fines, a new statutory tort for serious invasions, and heightened Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) enforcement.
From data breaches costing millions of dollars to individuals suing directly for privacy violations, these updates demand proactive compliance from large businesses handling customer or employee data.
As commercial law solicitors at Argon Law, we break down the essentials: what’s changed, the real-world risks like the Australian Clinical Labs (ACL) penalty, and steps to safeguard your operations under Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).

These new reforms target accountability in an AI-driven, data-heavy economy and attempt to provide recourse for individuals affected by the new digital landscape:
These changes have shifted the existing legislation from a reactive set of regulations to empowering individuals and regulators, and businesses have already been stung as a result of not complying with the new laws.
In October 2025, the Federal Court ordered Australian Clinical Labs (ACL) to pay $5.8 million in civil penalties after a significant data breach involving its Medlab Pathology business in 2022. More than 223,000 individuals had their personal information accessed without authorisation as a result of a cyberattack.
This is a landmark case – it’s the first civil penalty issued under the Federal Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and highlights how businesses and organisations need to understand their obligations as part of the new legislation.
Australian Information Commissioner Elizabeth Tydd welcomed this result, reminding all organisations to be vigilant and proactive in managing personal information. The outcome makes it clear: all businesses must take privacy obligations seriously or face significant penalties.
In fact, penalties for privacy breaches have increased sharply. For breaches after 13 December 2022, fines can be as high as $50 million per breach (or even more, in certain scenarios).
It’s important to understand that ACL were not penalised for being a target of a data breach. Instead the civil penalties were a result of not complying with their obligations. The Federal Court’s decision highlighted three main failures:
This landmark case is a wakeup call for businesses with the Commissioner emphasising that business owners need to be vigilant and to expect more OAIC actions in 2026.
Businesses should understand their new obligations and the potential risks for not being compliant. These new obligations include:
The Privacy Act now includes a statutory right for individuals to sue for a serious invasion of privacy – this is called a “tort” of privacy. This is a big change as individuals no longer have to wait for the regulator to act. The basics:
Significantly, this new tort applies even when conducts fall outside the scope of the Privacy Act (which typically exempts most employee records) and covers “serious” invasions like unauthorised surveillance or data leaks. Employers and business owners should be aware of:
With higher penalties and new opportunities for legal action, business owners must be careful with third-party service providers, including AI vendors. There are a range of risks that come with businesses engaging in the digital ecosystem including:
Although the changes are significant, there are steps businesses can take to ensure compliance with the new laws and mitigate potential risks.
Ask yourself:
Regardless of whether your data stays in Australia, you may need a formal data breach response plan (especially if you turn over more than $3 million or handle sensitive data).
For more information on Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) and ongoing reforms, visit the OAIC’s official resource page.
A: Introduction of much higher penalties and a new privacy tort that allows individuals to sue directly for “serious invasion of privacy.”
A: Serious breaches can cost up to $50 million per incident (or more, depending on profits/turnover).
A: APP 11 requires you to take reasonable steps to protect personal information. This includes securing your IT systems, training staff, and regularly reviewing privacy policies.
A: Yes. Even if employee records are not covered by the Privacy Act, inappropriate surveillance or data handling can result in a tort claim.
A: Purpose of data use, limits on use, breach notification, requirements for destruction or return of data, consent for sub-processors, and strong indemnity clauses.
A: Obtain explicit consent, check for equivalent overseas privacy protections, and have solid agreements covering all privacy risks.
A: If your business turns over more than $3 million or handles sensitive information, yes – you should have a written plan ready including assessment, notification, and remediation protocols.
A: Visit the OAIC’s APP resource page for details and updates.
A: If your business turns over more than $3 million or handles sensitive information, you should have a written plan ready.
A: Visit the OAIC’s APP resource page for details and updates.
With penalties rising and tort claims emerging, don’t wait for a breach like ACLs. If you’re looking to ensure your business is compliant with the new Privacy Law changes, get in touch with the Argon Law team, who can help to review your business compliance and mitigate any risks.
Copyright © - 2025. Argon Law. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy