
By Nanae Yoshiwara, Senior Associate | Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Commercial leases are crucial agreements that underpin the business relationship between landlords and tenants. When properly drafted, they create a stable foundation for both parties, ensuring smooth business operations. However, disputes can arise when terms are unclear or incomplete, which can be costly and time-consuming to resolve.
This article outlines the essential components of a well-drafted commercial lease, common issues that arise from unclear clauses, and the legal recourse available to landlords and tenants in Queensland.
For a commercial lease to be legally binding, it must contain certain essential elements. Under Queensland law, the following are the absolute minimum requirements:
While these elements ensure that the lease is valid, more comprehensive terms should be included to minimise the risk of disputes. These terms should address:
Having a lease that is both legally binding and well-structured helps both parties avoid costly disputes and ensures smooth operations throughout the lease term.
In many cases, parties may rely on DIY lease templates found online. While these templates can cover the essential terms, they often lack the detail necessary to prevent or resolve disputes. For example:
Even though a DIY lease may technically bind the parties, its inadequacies often make it more difficult to resolve conflicts. Under the legal principle of contra proferentem, any ambiguity in the lease will generally be interpreted against the party who drafted the contract or the party seeking to rely on the ambiguous provision. This means that if a DIY lease contains unclear terms, the courts may interpret those terms unfavourably for the party who prepared the lease.
This highlights the importance of having clear and precise language in all lease provisions, especially in key areas like termination.
In cases where a commercial lease does not specify how to terminate the agreement, landlords have a few options under Queensland law:
Nevertheless, in the case of termination under Section 131, the breach must typically involve a significant or essential term of the lease, meaning one that goes to the core of the agreement. Examples of breaches that justify termination include failure to pay rent, violating use clauses (e.g., using the premises for an unauthorised purpose), or failure to maintain insurance. Minor or trivial breaches, especially those that do not affect the landlord’s ability to use the property, are generally not sufficient to justify termination.
It is important to seek legal advice before taking any steps to terminate a lease, especially if the lease does not clearly outline the termination process. Our lawyers can assist landlords in navigating these legal complexities and ensure that the termination process is legally sound and enforceable.
Tenants can take proactive steps to avoid disputes and potential termination:
If a tenant believes they are being unfairly targeted with a breach notice, they should seek legal advice to ensure that the landlord is acting within the bounds of the lease and the law. Argon Law can assist tenants in defending against unreasonable termination actions and in resolving disputes before they escalate.
At Argon Law, our lawyers are experienced in commercial lease disputes and can assist both landlords and tenants in navigating the complexities of lease agreements. Whether you need advice on drafting leases, responding to breach notices, or negotiating lease terminations, we provide tailored legal solutions to meet your needs.
Contact us today to find out how we can help you resolve your commercial lease dispute and ensure a positive outcome for your business or read about the latest changes to tenants rights and safety standards.
Copyright © - 2025. Argon Law. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy