
By Nanae Yoshiwara, Senior Associate
Co-owning property can offer financial advantages, but relationships and disagreements can complicate decision‑making. When co‑owners cannot agree on sale, division, or maintenance of jointly held land, Queensland law offers a structured remedy under the Property Law Act 2023 (Qld).
When land is held by more than one owner, conflicts can arise for various reasons:
These types of disputes are often complicated by personal relationships, particularly in cases involving family members or business partners. These disputes can also become emotionally charged, especially when family relationships or long-standing friendships are involved. If you’re considering purchasing property with family, business partners or friends, read our article on how to avoid complications in a shared property purchase to help avoid these disputes in the future.

Under the 2023 Act, co-owners may apply to the Supreme Court to resolve deadlocks through:
The applicant must notify any security interest holders within 30 days of filing the application. When co-owners are at an impasse, Queensland law allows one or more co-owners to apply to the Supreme Court to force a sale of the property or appoint a trustee to manage the sale of the property. This ensures that the property can be sold, even if one or more co-owners refuse to participate.
If the Court concludes that appointing a trustee is necessary or desirable, it may order:
Imagine you inherited a property with your siblings. You would like to sell the property and divide the proceeds, but one sibling insists on keeping the property and refuses to cooperate. In this situation, you can apply to the court to appoint a trustee to sell the property, even if your sibling disagrees.
The court-appointed trustee will handle the sale, ensuring that all parties receive their fair share of the proceeds after expenses like mortgage repayments, unpaid rates, and legal costs are deducted.
The Court has broad discretion to tailor orders by:
The Court must prioritise sale, unless physical division or a mixed approach is more just and fair. It considers:
The trustee becomes vested in the property (subject to any security interests), similar to a vesting order under the Trusts Act.
Security interests over the whole property remain, but those over undivided shares are converted into interests in the sale proceeds.
The clear statutory structure and trustee’s independence mean that co-owners often reach negotiated solutions before proceeding. This mechanism also clarifies expectations, helps assess fairness of outcomes, and ensures efficient resolution.
If you are facing a co-ownership dispute and considering forcing a sale, or if you are being pressured into a sale and want to protect your rights, we can help.
At Argon Law, we provide experienced legal advice and representation to guide you through the process. From drafting the necessary court documents to negotiating settlements and representing you in court, we ensure your interests are protected every step of the way.
Contact us today to discuss your options and learn how we can help you resolve your co-ownership dispute.
Copyright © - 2025. Argon Law. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy